Posted by: Mike Clough

The Difference Between Brand and Branding

A couple of weeks ago I posted Branding Is The Key to Differentiation which was very well received. However, it was simply a primer on “branding”. My plan was to follow-up with a primer about creating a “brand”, explain the differences between brand and branding. and show you how to also differentiate yourself with your brand. However, before I could do so, a reader, Tim Negris, product/marketing executive and developer, beat me to the punch. He sent me a comment that was so well written using an excellent example, that I requested his permission to share it with you unedited as the follow-up to my post on branding. I can’t imagine how I could improve on it, so, here it is:

Even if a business, big or small, has great branding – effective name, slogan, color scheme, etc. – they still might not have a great brand. In the language of marketing, branding is syntax (structure) and brand is semantics (meaning). A company’s “meaning” is its place in the marketplace and the customer’s business or life.

Ideally, a company should have a strong brand that is supported by strong branding, but many wildly successful companies have goofy names, ugly colors, and tortuous slogans, but they have great brands. That is, they do a great job of communicating their meaning – best quality, trend setter, most innovative, longest history, most locations, caring people, etc. In music, it is called a “hook”.

Small business start-ups especially need to think not just about who they are, what they look like, and what they do, but also what they want to mean to their customers, what is their hook. If they have a strong brand, the branding will often follow easily.

7-11When the 7-11 convenience store chain was just starting out, they were competing with suburban supermarkets and urban corner stores, both of which were typically open for approximately the same hours as most people worked, 9-5. The 7-11 “hook” was the customer convenience of longer hours, 7am to 11pm, and that drove their branding. The name said it all. They didn’t need a slogan, the logo was the name, and the logo and colors were clear on a small lighted sign – a necessity before daylight and after dark.

When the other stores realized the power of convenience over selection, quality and other brand promises and started keeping longer hours, 7-11 went one better and commenced round the clock operation in most locations. Note, they did not change their name to 24-7; they didn’t need to because they already owned the convenience brand and everybody would quickly learn that they never closed. Then the other stores went to always open. The corner store was largely dead by then and the supermarkets asserted the “low price and selection at any time” brands. 7-11 countered this by actually promoting their smaller physical size in redefining convenience as “fast in and out”. This was especially effective once the supermarkets had to start competing with big box retailers by getting even bigger.

7-11′s success spawned myriad directly competitive imitators who echoed every one of 7-11′s brand promises, plus offered gasoline, which 7-11 was not yet selling. But, 7-11′s massive global reach and superior logistics enabled them to easily add gasoline to their product mix, to lower their prices and to offer fresh snacks and sandwich meals. The latter also allowed them to differentiate themselves once again, compete with fast food take-out places and strengthen their brand by broadening the meaning of convenience to include faster, cheaper breakfast and lunch.

7-11 started out with strong branding. Their name/logo was easy to say, remember, and see on a small lighted sign, and their red and green color scheme carried the strong subliminal message of “stop and go”. But, they became and remain successful through a strong brand, by staying current with the meaning of consumer convenience – always there, everywhere, low prices, known quality, fast, and thorough coverage of common urgent needs (gas, drinks, snacks, aspirin, tampons, etc.)

The lesson this should teach the start-up is to know and communicate what you want to mean to your customers. What it should teach established companies of all sizes is to learn and know how to change and extend your meaning to anticipate your customers’ changing needs and to stay ahead of the competition.

Good branding – valuable.   Great brand – priceless.

If you would like to contact Tim Negris, you can do so through LinkedIn or tnegris @ gmail.com. The only thing I would add to Tim’s thoughts is that what he has written also applies to the product brand and your personal brand.

Those that enjoyed this article, also enjoyed:
Branding Is The Key to Differentiation
Monitoring and Protecting Your Brand

If you would like to contact me, you can do so by emailing me at mike.clough@bestbizpractices.org or visiting my LinkedIn page.

Share

Responses

I really enjoyed this article and agree with you. I have been consutling for years on the emotional attachment people have to a brand “way of doing business, or well perceived message” and still people seem to miss it. People want sales and talk about hitting the pavement, but if that emotional connection is not made, and rejunivated on a regualr basis “reminded off”, you end up failing because your emotionally disconnet with clients as well.

Excellent article. If you want to take it one step further (in a specific social media context), I suggest reading “Brands in the Age of Social Media” at my blog at http://www.socialsteve.wordpress.com

Thanks for sharing this,
Social Steve

Intreresting article indeed. I was thinking of brand and branding in terms of
emotion=brand
proces to reach the emotion=branding.

At the end, sucessful branding=brand
Unsucesfull branding=me too product

Great article, I do now understand the importance of branding to some extent

How does my company name sound, we are into corporate consulting in India

Manhaday Consultants Private Limited

All the best

Microsoft has been trying to develop a brand for their search. Live did not work and now they are trying Bing. It took years for Google to be well known and I bet a lot of non-internet users do not know them. Will be interesting to see if Bing works out.

David Stewart
my.SurfTheWeb.com

Very well written and nicely describe the meanings or BRAND.

-sahdev

Branding has allways been a problem for me to fully understand. This has helped to a point but its still can be so broad.

B.J. Brown

Excellent article differentiating between Brand and Branding concepts. Most of the companies fail concentrating on brand and confusing between brand and branding.

Absolutely Right!!! One needs to keep in mind what he/she/company/startup or whoever wants to be known as….once you have set your image right …you will automatically find ways of communicating it .

I really loved this post.
Its quite important to understand the brand value, the brand and build it appropriately.

I had read and worked on something similar some time ago and represented it as:

http://collaborative-innovation.blogspot.com/2007/04/brand-building-and-gap-in-brand.html

Very good article!

In particular, “know and communicate what you want to mean to your customers” was on target. Great branding can grab someones attention. It is the Brand that makes them connect in some meaningful way.

Individuals as well as organizations need to be clear about what they mean to their target clients. What Value they bring. What solution they provide. If an individual cannot grasp the meaning they bring, communicate it clearly and distinctly, they are floating around on the Sea of Ambiguity.

Thanks Glen. I felt Tim’s comment to my original post was so well written that I would do better posting his comment than writing a follow-up myself.

Hi,

I enjoyed reading this post. A Brand is different from branding..explained well.

If you and/or your readers would like to hear some excellent tips for branding from top executives, take a look at http://www.brandfasttrackers.com.

1) Tell me the difference between direct and indirect marketing?

2) I would like to know about the difference between personal selling and direct marketing?

My definition of “Direct Marketing” is when you market directly to the consumer (i.e. telephone, email, mail, etc.). “Indirect Marketing” is like advertising.

I am not sure what you mean by “personal”. But there is a major difference between marketing and selling. “Marketing” includes activities such as pricing, distribution (i.e. direct, indirect, wholesale, retail, private label, etc.) and promotion (i.e. advertising, sales promotion, branding, etc.). “Selling” is the use of the various works of marketing to secure the sale in various environments (i.e. face to face, online, catalogs, etc.).

Generally, marketing people know the difference between sales and marketing, sales people do not. Generally, marketing know they may not be a skilled salesperson, but most salespeople see themselves a skilled marketing people which usually is not the case in reality.

Having said this, I would also add that definitions are different in different countries.

As usual great post Mike! I will add Tim to my network on Linkedin.

Leave a response

Your response:

 

Categories